With little time to fish over the last few days, I have only been able to manage three short sessions. There is a local pond that has drawn me alongside it several times when walking, and it finally, this week, tempted me to cast a line. The surroundings of the pond are quite gorgeous, trees, reeds, rushes, and with no visible hint of the road, just 5 or 6 yards away. The nearby housing estate also remains out of sight, masked by the steep wilderness that is present just a yard from the pond itself, which is at most 15 yards wide, and 80 long. The trees are indeed, so dense as to allow the traffic, and its noise, to go unseen and largely unheard. The trees have not hidden it from the local kids though, and their presence can usually be seen even in their absence, by the copious amounts of litter and cans that sadly decorate the banks, and even float amongst the weed in the pond itself. I remove a bagful of rubbish each trip, but more appears almost immediately. I was pleased to see, one morning, that someone else had also had taken time to remove some of the more obvious detritus. My thanks to you sir, or perhaps to you, madam. But the pond has long been abandoned by the club that owned it, and its free fishing status, in these modern times, will always attract anglers young and old, many of whom have little regard for the natural world amongst which they sit.
Moorhens patrol the edges of the pond, along with one solitary mallard. Occasionally a heron ventures onto the end of the pond, where the shallow water certainly affords it some good hunting opportunity. Occasionally young sparrowhawks can be glimpsed and heard in the trees opposite. They do not show themselves well enough for a photograph.
The pond is nowhere more than a couple of feet deep, most being half that, and the Canadian pond weed covers at least 95% of the surface, and rises partway to the surface in much of what remains. A few smallish carp always wander just under the surface, scarcely noticing the presence of people, unless they make their presence too obvious. The kids regard them as uncatchable, but one readily took the small piece of flake that I threw near to it. I have seen one carp of maybe 8 or 9 pounds, the rest reaching 4 pounds at most, but still a challenge to land through the thick weed growth. The kids of course talk of 15 pound carp, and one even talks of having caught tench to 11 pounds here. I don't for a moment believe any of it. Apart from the carp I have seen a few 6 inch rudd swimming along when the water is gin clear. Clear enough to see that swan mussels are present in numbers on the bottom of the pond. After any fair amount of rain, runoff from the hill opposite quickly colours the water, and the clarity of the water can change tremendously from day to day. A couple of days sees it clear again, as another thin layer of fine sediment drifts to the bottom. The pond will probably be too shallow for fish in a very few years time. Even now, I fear a bad cold snap could kill all fish life in it.
I arrive for my first session at about 6 pm, two kids are in the "best" swim, that one swim with enough clear water as to not need accurate casting. There are just two other fishable swims, and no fish can be seen in either open area, for today the water is tapwater clear. But there is a small gap in the pondweed at the far side of one clearing, offering the fish some shelter, and I decide to go for it. I am unpractised at casting a float with precision, but soon find that my travel barbel rod is perfect for the job, and I have little problems landing the float on target. Line is 5 pounds to a 14 hook, a little heavy, but I foresee problems with fish and the weeds. I am aiming at no more than a couple of square yards of open water at maybe 12 yards range, and I soon get the hang of it, but so often the bait is impeded as it falls to be bottom, by strands of the rampant Elodea canadensis. But it is not long before my flat float twitches, as something investigates the tiny pinch of breadflake on my hook. The float sails away and I miss the bite. A second cast results in a pricked fish, felt just momentarily before it sheds the hook and dives into the weed. I see a flash of gold, and so suspect a rudd. The point is proved next cast as a pristine 6 inch rudd, gloriously coloured red and gold, is landed and returned. A similar sized roach is next. This fish too has surely never been hooked. I muse that the kids probably, in the main, catch little with their Decathlon telescopic rods and heavy lines, and so the fish retain their condition. I fished similarly myself, with a tank aerial rod aged about 12, and caught very little myself, but gradually taught myself more and more with each trip. I would not myself have welcomed advice from the adults back then, and decide not to volunteer information to the kids unless they ask for it. In any case one of them tells me he has already caught a bream of a pound. Being a naturally suspicious sod, I doubt both the species and the weight, but say nothing other than a mumbled congratulation.
One of the kids draws my attention to "a bug" in my landing net. He shows signs of being worried by it. So I look and it proves to be the empty shell of a dragonfly larva. The shell is brown and quite dry, and I am surprised as to how it reached my landing net, which was a yard from the water. But a couple of minutes later a gorgeous green dragonfly drifts past me. I hope it came from my empty larval case, and hatched out in my net, but will never know.
My float dithers again, and I am into a better fish, which immediately reaches the pondweed. Canadian pondweed usually pulls free from the bottom with steady pressure, and the fish comes quietly, its head covered in weed. he weed trails a muddy track behind it from its roots. The fish is a mirror carp of some 3 or 4 ounces. I am surprised, but pleased, as it suggests very strongly that those few carp have bred successfully. 4 more carp, mirrors and commons, of similar size follow, each after a short interval, together with more, but even smaller rudd, and a tench of 8 inches or so. I had not expected tench either. All gave good bites, and all the fish were scale perfect, of great colour and very healthy. Several came in with a garland of weed around them. Bites dried up, and as dark closed in I decide to pack up. As I reeled in that last, last cast, I felt another fish on the end of the line. A spirited little fight saw a 4 ounce crucian carp on the bank, a 5th species, and also unexpected. It had, with typical crucian behaviour, not given any bite indication at all.
All in all, a dozen fish from a tiny pond. And what an enjoyable session it was, a pleasing change from the expectation of a sizeable fish. Many years ago, I was a big fish only angler, I finally stopped fishing, suddenly, one June 16th after catching a personal best tench. It had all become too easy, and I didn't then cast another line for 33 years. It was probably a mistake, way back then, to have exclusively targeted monster fish. Even the regular successes became a bore. Maybe I should have varied my fishing back then too, taken in some small waters, with small fish, and probably enjoyed my fishing far more. Maybe I wasted those 33 years, for, over the last three years since returning to the fold, I no longer need to seek out those big fish every trip. No, what I need now is variation, something different every trip, if that is possible, and this small pond fishing has been a revelation. Having discarded that "specimen hunter" tag three years ago, when I once more picked up a rod, I now enjoy my angling again.
My second and third trips added a couple of small bream to the species list, 7 or 8 small tench, some no more than 4 inches long, none bigger than 8 inches, and some of the smallest rudd I have ever seen. Fish this size are unhooked in the hand, and reminded me how silky smooth and pleasant to the touch small tench are. And how damn slippery too! Perhaps evolution has given them silky smooth skin, (smooth enough to make the wife jealous), to enable them to slip easily between the weeds?
I shall be back, both to this and to other, similar, waters.
So I did go back, the next morning, fairly early. As I breasted the slope up to the pond, a startled grey heron took flight, annoyed with me for disturbing it. The moorhens were absent, still kipping in the reeds I guess. I was fishing within two minutes, having travelled very light, and only needing to assemble the 5 rod sections, bait the hook and cast in. A few carp were to be seen disturbing the surface, and when one swam towards me, across the weed-free area, I decided to test whether they were, as the young kid had said, uncatchable. I drew the float and bait back, stopping a couple of feet in front of the carp, directly below the rod tip. The flake fluttered slowly down, and with no hesitation the carp took it: I saw it disappear into its mouth and struck. The effect was instantaneous and expected, for the fish, about 4 or 5 pounds accelerated and dived straight into the weedbeds, within a second or so of being hooked. Having the rod tip immediately above the fish was not helpful, and no lateral force could be applied to slow the fish. ( think O-level resolution of forces). And so the fish, as expected, was lost, the 5 pound line snapping very quickly as the fish changed course within the weedbed. I knew beforehand that I had no chance of course, and maybe should not have even tried. But point proved, the carp are catchable ... with suitable tackle.
A few 3 inch rudd, and a 3 ounce tench followed. Later I struck at a very tentative nibble, the sort of thing I had been ignoring all morning, but somehow this one was different, and a hard fighting 3 ounce crucian came to the bank. Beautiful fish: crucians, and how anyone could confuse F1 hybrids with them is beyond me. Hybrids always "look wrong" and purebred fish always "look right".
At around 8 am the moorhens appeared, and so did their young: one by one 4 young birds emerged cautiously from the reeds. One of their parents even appeared to chase off a cruising carp, much to my amusement. A second mallard flew in to join the lonesome female seen yesterday. Then a flash of brilliant blue, and a kingfisher landed opposite. Over the next 20 minutes it made several dives, from various trees, but caught only one small fish, probably a rudd. It looked like a young bird, not quite as brightly coloured as kingfishers usually are. Its dives looked amateurish, at far too shallow an angle. But it had no problems battering its one capture against a tree branch to stun or kill it. 8 or 9 raps, and the fish was then swallowed. Had the bird in that song about "the old lady who swallowed a fly" been a kingfisher, there is no way that the spider would have still been wriggling after being swallowed. Which would have been a good argument if kingfishers ate spiders, I suppose. The kingfisher was still around when the heron returned, to perch in a tree opposite me. A somewhat scruffy young bird, whose preening did little to improve its looks. It finally flew off in the ungainly manner that herons have, and I left the pond, well satisfied with my couple of hours by the water.